
Originally Posted by
TKO Tom
I thought it was a decent fight. There is a lot of nuances to James Toney's game but he just doesn't get the credit for it by the judges. Guys like us, yes, but the judges - no.
I scored the fight 114-114. I had it 6-5-1 in rounds for Samuel Peter but with the point deduction in the ninth that brings the score to 114-114 on my card. Toney lost the fight in the last three rounds on my card because I thought he lost the 10th and the 12th rounds.
Had James Toney shown up in shape he would have won this fight going away. Toney has nobody but himself to blame. Peter was huffing and puffing after four rounds but because Toney was not in the shape to do more he couldn't pull away from Peter. It's sad, because Toney would have beaten Rahman and Peter had he just been in better condition.
The judges were way off in my opinion. The two scores of 116-111 for Peter mean they both gave James Toney three rounds which is fucking crazy! This was a one or two point fight either way - not a three, four or five point spread!
The problem with trying to score this fight was twofold: (1.) Toney won many of the rounds in the early part of the round. James would win the first minute or minute and a half. Then he would let Peter come on and win the ends of the rounds. We all know that judges seem to remember the ends of the rounds rather than the beginning. (2.) Peter landed the bigger harder shots that moved Toney around. Toney landed more shots but they weren't hard shots. They were jabs and this is pro boxing where the more damaging shots are supposed to mean more. The problem with judging this fight was like Al Bernstein noted, do you give more credence to the harder shots or more volume?
It was a difficult fight to score and probably one of the more difficult fights you will see to pick a winner. You really had to be paying attention. If you took your eye away from the set or were sitting around slugging beers you were missing the one punch that could have decided the round.
Al Bernstein had it 115-113 Toney, Carlos Arias had it 114-113 Toney, Doug Fischer had it 115-113 Toney and Steve Springer had it 115-112 Toney.
The problem with listening to the scores of the press row guys is this (and I know because I've sat there with them). What they do is watch a round of a fight and then they sorta' discuss amongst themselves who they thought won it. The press row scoring is like a consultation scoring. They'll say, "Who do you think won that round?" And then they agree, "Oh, OK I'll give it to Toney too." They all sit together and banter about the scoring of a round. It's not really an objective score. Like I say, I know, because I've sat there with them. Fischer, Springer and Arias are all buddies and they were all right there together scoring the fight together and you can't do that.
Lastly, Peter now gets the right to fight Oleg Maskaev - and Big Sam will murder him.
Bookmarks