
Originally Posted by
doomeddisciple
G'day Ron -
While on referee's and your post about rabbit punches in the Ali Wepner fight -I watched Lionel Rose fight Rocky Gattellari for the Australian Bantamweight title in the fight immediatley prior to Rose's victory over Fighting Harada.
The fight took place in 1967 in Sydney and was a classic Aussie rivalry, with Rose representing Melbourne and Gattellari - 21-1-0 at the time, being favoured by the Sydney-siders. This drew on some all time inter-city rivalry the two biggest Aussie cities have had over nearly everything since colonisation.
Reply: Always liked Lionel, he was tough and skilled. Olivares did the job on him but that is no shame. Those were the days.
Anyway - Getting to the question!
In the fight, from round 1 on - and in part due to the way Rose would use shoulder and hip rolling movements to slip punches - Gattelari was catching him behind the ear or even further back on numerous occasions throughout the fight and never was warned once by the referee.
My question is how long ago was rabbit punching outlawed and how was it defined in the late 60's - Was rabbit punching only considered rabbit punching when the two fighters were engaged in a clinch or on top of one anther in the pocket?
Because at no time did the ref even say "Oi! Stop that mate! No rabbit punching here"!
I could only surmise that the rule may not have been around then or that it wasn't considered technically a rabbit punch unless the two fighters were in the clinch - Nearly all of the shots that were illegal to me were similar to Floyd Vs Hatton when Ricky lost a point - except they actually landed.
It didn't help Gattellari - He was dropped twice in the 13th and had to be stretchered out of the ring after a beautiful short right hand in the second knockdown. Of course it didn't seem to affect Mr Rose - As above, he put in the performance of his life in his very next fight.
Gattellari ended up drawing an 8 rounder a year later and the retired after he made an ill fated come back for the Aussie bantam crown over ten years later in 1979.
Reply: Good to her from you and thanks for writing. The age old practice of two fighters constantly going behind the head as if it were an integral part of a professional fighter's reportoir can be seen on film since boxing film was made. If you watch the fights through the decades you can see them all hammering away behind the head in clinches, tit for tat, retaliating in kind without a damn thing ever said by the referee. I remember Rubin Carter and Georgie Benton doing that to each other, and Giardello and all his opponents.
Griffith, Ortega, Florentino Fernandez, Torres all the guys.
It seemed all of a sudden in the early 70's or so, and I am happy to stand corrected by our vast amount of knowledgeable guys on the Zone, it was becoming an unnacceptable foul. It is a dangerous thing to do and it will cause damage to a fighter as sure as time goes on. What was allowed in the Ali v Wepner fight was a disgrace and a mockery of having a referee in there at all. I still cannot believe what was allowed.
Also while on your assesment of ref's -
In your view - Is Jay Nady as bad a ref as everyone makes him out to be?
Reply: Yes.
You made the comment in a previous post about ref's ruining fights by stopping them too early - A stigma surrounding Nady since the Tszyu-Judah fight - Would you prefer to have Nady ref you fight or someone that lets it go too long before someone is seriously injured?
Reply: Neither. I want a guy who can differentiate between both scenarios accurately. E.g. Two punches land in a lightning, devastating fashion. I refereed David Tua twice and his hook was one of the hardest in history in my opinion. He hits John Ruiz and he hangs there with his hands down, Then and there is the time to stop it while he is helpless, not being so far away that you can't get there on a Harley in time to stop two more shots that might kill the man.
Ali is on the ropes taking a battering from Foreman but some of the punches are missing and he is firing back, he is blocking them, or Merqui Sosa is on the ropes being blasted by Roy Jones Jr, but some of the shots are missing and he is not hurt and his hands are up, a good referee knows the combatants, their tendencies and must keep his head without paying attention to ANYONE from ringside or pulling the trigger too soon.
Getting up from a devastating knockdown is different that getting up from a flash knockdown and severe concussion can be present. I was always trained to make them take a step forward and give them room to do so, not like the time Lewis was stopped and the referee stood so close to him he could not fall forward but into the referee, give them room, be close enough to give them a loud count and with your fingers clearly shown, but back enough if they are standing to see if they wobble.
It comes from fight experience as a fighter and boxing guy, not from being an amateur referee.
Joe Cortez is another one I'd love to read your thoughts on- I liked Joe when he refereed fights like Fenech Nelson I - where he did the opposite of the Mayweather/Hatton fight and let them go at it inside all night - I detested him when he DQ'd Tszyu for hitting on the break and breaking Leonardo Mas' jaw in the 1st round.
Always interested in your words mate, thanks,
Reply: Sorry, I just never thought he was a good referee, too inconsistent, and shouts unintelligable gibberish commands, the commands are yelled out in mumbles and the cadence is bizzare and confusing. I respect the bi-lingual thing and I know his brother Mike had some fights in the Garden and Joe they say boxed a bit, but he is out of shape and has scored too many fights and built a career on Hazzard using him very much in NJ for a variety of reasons.
If anyone but him made these same mistakes so much they would be sat down long ago, despite having rhyming cute theme sayings in mid ring.
Makes way too many mistakes over the years and he is never, and I stress never, called on them. No one in charge cares who knows enough about boxing to take action and get others in there instead. It is a clique of ignorance never in this life to be broken unless a total house cleaning occurrs in NY, NJ and Nevada. There is not one commentator alive that acts like they know anything about refereeing. One guy does but he will never expose what they do, to remain politically correct. That one guy does know though but he won't admit the worst about them. Too tight a clique.
Josh
Bookmarks