I really hate to sound ignorant, but could somebody please explain the difference between a split decision and a majority decision?
the very confused
134
| Home | News | Current Champs | WAIL! | Encyclopedia |
| The Cyber Boxing Zone Message Board |
I really hate to sound ignorant, but could somebody please explain the difference between a split decision and a majority decision?
the very confused
134
2 judges for Boxer A, third judge for Boxer B (A gets a split decision)
2 for Boxer A, the third calls it a draw (A gets a majority decision)
Thanks for the clarification. Didn't both these use to be split decisions? I must have been hit in the head to many times, I don't remember there being any distinction between the two when I was younger.
The somewhat less confused
134
They have always termed this way.
Add to this, the Majority Draw: Two Judges call the bout even and one judge votes for one fighter.
See Dokes Weaver II.
Hawk
I believe Pea-Chavez was a majority draw?
So, really, he sort of won it!
See also, BoxRec Glossary.Originally Posted by thewonderful134
![]()
The two Patterson-Quarry fights were the best example of these decisions.
IMO had Patterson been more aggressive, he could have easily won both fights.
#1 - 1 scores a 1 point edge for Quarry, 2 score it even (Majority Draw)
Floyd gave this one away by playing cigar store Indian the last two rounds letting Jerry salvage a draw.
#2 - 2 score a 1 point edge for Quarry, ref Vern Bybee scores it even. (Majority Decision)
The first scrap was much, much more exciting. I watched the rematch again recently and it seems like nothing more than a glorified sparring session.
Interesting that in the 22 rounds fought between the two, the general consensus in scoring was 11 rounds Patterson, 9 rounds Quarry w/2 rounds even. The knockdowns were the difference. 4-1 Quarry tho the two in the second fight were flash ones (Floyd looked more embarrassed than hurt)
| News | Current Champs | WAIL! | Encyclopedia | Links | Home |
Bookmarks